🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents praising your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women joined an organized professional network test this week following viral posts indicated that changing their gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" language - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "assertive" language

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced positive outcomes. One writer who changed both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where the same content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."