🔗 Share this article

An activist group has stated to have scraped millions of tracks from the popular streaming service and is preparing to publish them publicly.

Potential Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Training

Industry experts said the apparent leak could aid artificial intelligence firms searching for material to train their technology.

A group called Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million entries of associated data such as artist and record names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the leak did not constitute its full inventory.

“We have identified and deactivated the malicious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” said a Spotify representative.

The Swedish service, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorised access identified a third party scraped public metadata and used questionable methods to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Declared Mission and Worries

The streaming service does not believe the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

The group asserted the music files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘torrents’, a method of exchanging large data files online.

“Naturally the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its mission as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and culture”.

Model Development and Copyright Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ copyright, said the breached music would probably be used for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on illegally sourced material is unfortunately widespread in the tech sector, so this accessed music is highly likely to end up training AI models,” he said.

The group's website makes references to a large online archive, a vast online archive of pirated books that has allegedly been leveraged by Meta to develop its AI models.

A founder of an AI startup wrote on LinkedIn that members of the public could in theory “create their own private free equivalent of Spotify”. The executive added it could also enable technology firms to “train on modern music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a key issue between creatives, writers and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Government Proposals and Reactions

Across Britain, creative professionals have raised concerns against a ministerial suggestion to let AI companies use protected work without permission unless the owner opts out. Almost every participant to a government call for evidence on the proposal has supported artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for technology, research and development informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the matter, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this right”. The administration has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by March 2025.